CMC · Materials(steel works, blast furnaces & rolling mills (coke ovens)) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-08-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Commercial Metals Co reported revenue of $7.8 billion in fiscal 2025. Of the $4.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 57.7% went back into the business and 35.4% to acquisitions. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 5.67 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20257.8B
Operating margin1.4%gross margin 15.6%
Return on invested capital1.6%13.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay275.2M3.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.5×net debt 203.6M
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B
2017
2018Revenue 4.6BOperating income 206.3M
2018
2019Revenue 5.8BOperating income 339.8M
2020Revenue 5.5BOperating income 432.6M
2021Revenue 6.7BOperating income 585.9M
2022Revenue 8.9BOperating income 1.6B
2023Revenue 8.8BOperating income 1.2B
2024Revenue 7.9BOperating income 683.6M
2025Revenue 7.8BOperating income 107.5M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-4.4%
+7.3%
—
Operating income
-59.0%
-24.3%
—
Net income
-58.9%
-21.2%
—
Earnings per share
-57.9%
-20.4%
—
Free cash flow per share
+10.2%
-11.4%
—
Dividend per share
+8.8%
+8.5%
—
Shares
-2.3%
-1.1%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 9.1%
0%10%20%30%
2017
2018Return on invested capital 11.3%
2018
2019Return on invested capital 15.5%
2020Return on invested capital 11.0%
2021Return on invested capital 13.4%
2022Return on invested capital 24.5%
2023Return on invested capital 17.1%
2024Return on invested capital 9.7%
2025Return on invested capital 1.6%
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2017
2018Economic profit 32.7M
2018
2019Economic profit 103.4M
2020Economic profit 56.1M
2021Economic profit 145.6M
2022Economic profit 790.8M
2023Economic profit 414.9M
2024Economic profit 30.7M
2025Economic profit -411.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
2.0%
Return on assets
1.2%
Asset turnover
1.09×
Overheads (SG&A)
9.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B1.0B1.5B
2017
2018Net income 138.5MFree cash flow -608.6MAfter stock-based pay -632.5M
2018
2019Net income 198.1MFree cash flow -101.8MAfter stock-based pay -126.9M
2020Net income 279.5MFree cash flow 603.6MAfter stock-based pay 571.7M
2021Net income 412.9MFree cash flow 44.3MAfter stock-based pay 632,000
2022Net income 1.2BFree cash flow 250.3MAfter stock-based pay 203.3M
2023Net income 859.8MFree cash flow 737.4MAfter stock-based pay 676.9M
2024Net income 485.5MFree cash flow 575.4MAfter stock-based pay 530.4M
2025Net income 84.7MFree cash flow 312.2MAfter stock-based pay 275.2M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
4.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 58%2.5B
Acquisitions 35%1.5B
Dividends 12%530.4M
Share buybacks 15%645.0M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -20%-877.6M
Over the same years it paid 314.2M in stock. 330.9M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$10-$5$0$5$10
2017
2018Earnings per share $1.17Free cash flow per share $-5.15Dividend per share $0.47
2018
2019Earnings per share $1.66Free cash flow per share $-0.85Dividend per share $0.47
2020Earnings per share $2.32Free cash flow per share $5.02Dividend per share $0.47
2021Earnings per share $3.38Free cash flow per share $0.36Dividend per share $0.47
2022Earnings per share $9.95Free cash flow per share $2.05Dividend per share $0.55
2023Earnings per share $7.25Free cash flow per share $6.22Dividend per share $0.63
2024Earnings per share $4.14Free cash flow per share $4.91Dividend per share $0.67
2025Earnings per share $0.74Free cash flow per share $2.74Dividend per share $0.71
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
112.5M115.0M117.5M120.0M122.5M
2017
2018Diluted shares 118.1M
2018
2019Diluted shares 119.1M
2020Diluted shares 120.3M
2021Diluted shares 122.0M
2022Diluted shares 122.4M
2023Diluted shares 118.6M
2024Diluted shares 117.2M
2025Diluted shares 114.1M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B1.0B1.5B
2017
2018Net debt -632.6M
2018
2019Net debt -189.8M
2020Net debt 515.2M
2021Net debt 579.0M
2022Net debt 1.2B
2023Net debt 505.9M
2024Net debt 236.2M
2025Net debt 203.6M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.5×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.78 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 56d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
5.67safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.31 × 6.56+2.05
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.63 × 3.26+2.05
Operating income ÷ assets 0.01 × 6.72+0.10
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.41 × 1.05+1.48
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.92below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.05+0.97
Gross margin slipping 1.10+0.58
Soft assets 0.94+0.38
Sales growth 0.98+0.88
Slower depreciation 1.04+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.06-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.09-0.41
Leverage rising 1.24-0.40
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$61.92discounted at 9.1% a year · 55% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
83.4×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
18.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.9×
Free cash flow yield
3.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today3.2B
Everything after, today4.0B
The whole business7.3B
Minus net debt-203.6M
What belongs to shareholders7.1B
Divided among 114.1M shares: <strong>$61.92</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2017
2018Reported -632.5M
2018
2019Reported -126.9M
2020Reported 571.7M
2021Reported 632,000
2022Reported 203.3M
2023Reported 676.9M
2024Reported 530.4M
2025Reported 275.2M
2026Projected 409.7M
2027Projected 438.2M
2028Projected 466.2M
2029Projected 493.3M
2030Projected 519.4M
2031Projected 543.9M
2032Projected 566.6M
2033Projected 587.0M
2034Projected 605.0M
2035Projected 620.1M
2017201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
8.4B
9.0B
9.5B
10.1B
10.6B
11.1B
11.6B
12.0B
12.4B
12.7B
Growth
7.5%
6.9%
6.4%
5.8%
5.3%
4.7%
4.2%
3.6%
3.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
4.9%
Free cash flow
409.7M
438.2M
466.2M
493.3M
519.4M
543.9M
566.6M
587.0M
605.0M
620.1M
Worth today
375.5M
368.1M
358.9M
348.1M
335.9M
322.4M
307.8M
292.3M
276.1M
259.4M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
8.1%
64
68
74
80
87
8.6%
59
63
67
72
78
9.1%
55
58
62
66
71
9.6%
51
54
57
61
65
10.1%
48
51
53
56
60
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
3.9%
44
48
52
56
61
4.4%
48
52
57
62
67
4.9%
52
57
62
67
73
5.4%
56
62
67
73
79
5.9%
61
66
72
78
85
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$34.63
Median$61.88
90th percentile$98.42
$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$46.79</b> and <b>$79.38</b>; one in ten below $34.63, one in ten above $98.42.
Does the long run make sense?
15.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 15.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
55%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$99,9691 purchase(s) by 1 insider(s)
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.