SNPS · Technology(services-prepackaged software) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-10-31
Synopsys Inc reported revenue of $7.1 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 12.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 13.0% from 2016, and it earned 2.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $11.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 42.2% went to buybacks and 11.7% back into the business; the share count rose 7.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 3 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.63 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 4 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20257.1B+12.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin13.0%gross margin 77.0%
Return on invested capital2.1%13.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay455.9M6.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA6.7×net debt 10.6B
Piotroski F-score3/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2016Revenue 2.4BOperating income 317.4M
2017Revenue 2.7BOperating income 347.6M
2018Revenue 3.1BOperating income 360.2M
2019Revenue 3.4BOperating income 520.2M
2020Revenue 3.7BOperating income 620.1M
2021Revenue 4.2BOperating income 734.8M
2022Revenue 4.6BOperating income 1.1B
2023Revenue 5.3BOperating income 1.3B
2024Revenue 6.1BOperating income 1.4B
2025Revenue 7.1BOperating income 914.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+15.2%
+13.9%
+12.6%
Operating income
-7.3%
+8.1%
+12.5%
Net income
+10.6%
+14.9%
+19.6%
Earnings per share
+8.5%
+13.5%
+18.7%
Free cash flow per share
-7.3%
+8.7%
+10.3%
Shares
+1.9%
+1.2%
+0.8%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.5%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%
2016Return on invested capital 7.6%
2017Return on invested capital 3.6%
2018Return on invested capital 7.4%
2019Return on invested capital 12.0%
2020Return on invested capital 11.8%
2021Return on invested capital 12.8%
2022Return on invested capital 18.1%
2023Return on invested capital 19.2%
2024Return on invested capital 14.1%
2025Return on invested capital 2.1%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B01.0B
2016Economic profit -32.0M
2017Economic profit -166.8M
2018Economic profit -43.8M
2019Economic profit 148.9M
2020Economic profit 167.5M
2021Economic profit 231.3M
2022Economic profit 533.0M
2023Economic profit 661.2M
2024Economic profit 500.8M
2025Economic profit -2.7B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
4.7%
Return on assets
2.8%
Asset turnover
0.15×
Research & development
35.1% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
10.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2016Net income 266.8MFree cash flow 519.7MAfter stock-based pay 422.1M
2017Net income 136.6MFree cash flow 562.2MAfter stock-based pay 453.9M
2018Net income 432.5MFree cash flow 325.4MAfter stock-based pay 185.4M
2019Net income 532.4MFree cash flow 602.4MAfter stock-based pay 447.4M
2020Net income 664.3MFree cash flow 836.6MAfter stock-based pay 588.0M
2021Net income 757.5MFree cash flow 1.4BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2022Net income 984.6MFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2023Net income 1.2BFree cash flow 1.5BAfter stock-based pay 950.4M
2024Net income 2.3BFree cash flow 1.3BAfter stock-based pay 575.2M
2025Net income 1.3BFree cash flow 1.3BAfter stock-based pay 455.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
11.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 12%1.3B
Acquisitions 0%0
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 42%4.8B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 46%5.2B
Over the same years it paid 3.7B in stock. The share count rose 7.1%. 1.1B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2016Earnings per share $1.72Free cash flow per share $3.36
2017Earnings per share $0.88Free cash flow per share $3.63
2018Earnings per share $2.82Free cash flow per share $2.12
2019Earnings per share $3.45Free cash flow per share $3.91
2020Earnings per share $4.27Free cash flow per share $5.37
2021Earnings per share $4.81Free cash flow per share $8.89
2022Earnings per share $6.29Free cash flow per share $10.24
2023Earnings per share $7.92Free cash flow per share $9.75
2024Earnings per share $14.51Free cash flow per share $8.13
2025Earnings per share $8.04Free cash flow per share $8.14
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
150.0M155.0M160.0M165.0M170.0M
2016Diluted shares 154.7M
2017Diluted shares 154.9M
2018Diluted shares 153.4M
2019Diluted shares 154.2M
2020Diluted shares 155.7M
2021Diluted shares 157.3M
2022Diluted shares 156.5M
2023Diluted shares 155.2M
2024Diluted shares 155.9M
2025Diluted shares 165.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-5.0B05.0B10.0B15.0B
2016Net debt -771.6M
2017Net debt -904.4M
2018Net debt -253.8M
2019Net debt -590.9M
2020Net debt -1.1B
2021Net debt -1.3B
2022Net debt -1.4B
2023Net debt -1.4B
2024Net debt -3.9B
2025Net debt 10.6B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
6.7×
Interest coverage
2× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.62 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
123 days collects in 78d, stock 82d, pays in 37d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
3of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.63safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.05 × 6.56+0.31
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.21 × 3.26+0.70
Operating income ÷ assets 0.02 × 6.72+0.13
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.42 × 1.05+1.49
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.94below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.40+1.29
Gross margin slipping 1.03+0.55
Soft assets 1.86+0.75
Sales growth 1.15+1.03
Slower depreciation 0.71+0.08
Overheads vs sales 1.18-0.20
Profit not in cash -0.00-0.02
Leverage rising 1.75-0.57
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 61% against revenue growing 15%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Capital spending (169M) is well below depreciation (660M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
The effective tax rate is 4.0%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
Net debt is 6.7 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$8.70discounted at 8.5% a year · 60% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
1.1×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
7.6×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.7×
Free cash flow yield
31.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today4.8B
Everything after, today7.3B
The whole business12.0B
Minus net debt-10.6B
What belongs to shareholders1.4B
Divided among 165.7M shares: <strong>$8.70</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Reported 422.1M
2017Reported 453.9M
2018Reported 185.4M
2019Reported 447.4M
2020Reported 588.0M
2021Reported 1.1B
2022Reported 1.1B
2023Reported 950.4M
2024Reported 575.2M
2025Reported 455.9M
2026Projected 499.7M
2027Projected 563.3M
2028Projected 627.8M
2029Projected 691.6M
2030Projected 753.1M
2031Projected 810.4M
2032Projected 861.7M
2033Projected 905.3M
2034Projected 939.5M
2035Projected 962.9M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
8.0B
9.1B
10.1B
11.1B
12.1B
13.0B
13.9B
14.6B
15.1B
15.5B
Growth
14.0%
12.7%
11.4%
10.2%
8.9%
7.6%
6.3%
5.1%
3.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
6.2%
Free cash flow
499.7M
563.3M
627.8M
691.6M
753.1M
810.4M
861.7M
905.3M
939.5M
962.9M
Worth today
460.6M
478.5M
491.5M
499.0M
500.8M
496.7M
486.8M
471.3M
450.8M
425.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.5%
11
17
24
33
43
8.0%
5
10
16
23
31
8.5%
-0
4
9
14
21
9.0%
-5
-1
3
7
13
9.5%
-9
-6
-2
2
6
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
5.0%
-12
-8
-3
2
7
5.6%
-7
-2
3
8
14
6.2%
-2
3
9
15
21
6.8%
3
9
15
21
28
7.5%
8
14
21
28
35
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-18.87
Median$8.59
90th percentile$48.55
$0.00$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-6.61</b> and <b>$27.30</b>; one in ten below $-18.87, one in ten above $48.55.
Does the long run make sense?
4.8×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 4.8 times that year's EBITDA.
5%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 50% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 5% on the new capital — it has earned 13% on average over the last five years.
60%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.