FTNT · Technology(computer peripheral equipment, nec) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Fortinet, Inc. reported revenue of $6.8 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 20.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 3.4% in 2016 to 30.7%, and it earned 75.4% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $13.5 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 63.2% went to buybacks and 14.8% back into the business; the share count fell 13.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.88 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20256.8B+20.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin30.7%gross margin 80.5%
Return on invested capital75.4%103.1% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay1.9B28.6% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash1.5B more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Share counts are in today's shares. The SEC's filings restate only recent years after a split, so these jumps were read as splits and the older years scaled to match — otherwise per-share figures would compare different units:
5-for-1 before fiscal 2020.
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2016Revenue 1.3BOperating income 42.9M
2017Revenue 1.5BOperating income 109.8M
2018Revenue 1.8BOperating income 234.4M
2019Revenue 2.2BOperating income 351.0M
2020Revenue 2.6BOperating income 531.8M
2021Revenue 3.3BOperating income 650.4M
2022Revenue 4.4BOperating income 969.6M
2023Revenue 5.3BOperating income 1.2B
2024Revenue 6.0BOperating income 1.8B
2025Revenue 6.8BOperating income 2.1B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+15.5%
+21.3%
+20.4%
Operating income
+29.1%
+31.4%
+54.0%
Net income
+29.3%
+30.6%
+56.9%
Earnings per share
+31.6%
+33.0%
+59.4%
Free cash flow per share
+17.4%
+20.6%
+28.0%
Shares
-1.7%
-1.8%
-1.6%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.5%
0.0%100.0%200.0%300.0%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Return on invested capital 56.0%
2021Return on invested capital 35.9%
2022Return on invested capital 132.4%
2023Return on invested capital 209.4%
2024Return on invested capital 62.5%
2025Return on invested capital 75.4%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Economic profit 415.3M
2021Economic profit 503.0M
2022Economic profit 885.1M
2023Economic profit 1.1B
2024Economic profit 1.4B
2025Economic profit 1.5B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
149.8%
Return on assets
17.8%
Asset turnover
0.65×
Research & development
12.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
3.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2016Net income 32.2MFree cash flow 278.5MAfter stock-based pay 156.1M
2017Net income 31.4MFree cash flow 459.1MAfter stock-based pay 321.9M
2018Net income 334.9MFree cash flow 585.9MAfter stock-based pay 423.0M
2019Net income 331.7MFree cash flow 715.8MAfter stock-based pay 541.7M
2020Net income 488.5MFree cash flow 957.8MAfter stock-based pay 766.1M
2021Net income 606.8MFree cash flow 1.2BAfter stock-based pay 995.9M
2022Net income 857.3MFree cash flow 1.4BAfter stock-based pay 1.2B
2023Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.7BAfter stock-based pay 1.5B
2024Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.9BAfter stock-based pay 1.6B
2025Net income 1.9BFree cash flow 2.2BAfter stock-based pay 1.9B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
13.5B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 15%2.0B
Acquisitions 4%541.4M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 63%8.5B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 18%2.4B
Over the same years it paid 2.0B in stock. The share count fell 13.3%. 6.5B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00
2016Earnings per share $0.04Free cash flow per share $0.32
2017Earnings per share $0.04Free cash flow per share $0.52
2018Earnings per share $0.38Free cash flow per share $0.67
2019Earnings per share $0.38Free cash flow per share $0.82
2020Earnings per share $0.58Free cash flow per share $1.14
2021Earnings per share $0.73Free cash flow per share $1.44
2022Earnings per share $1.06Free cash flow per share $1.80
2023Earnings per share $1.46Free cash flow per share $2.20
2024Earnings per share $2.26Free cash flow per share $2.43
2025Earnings per share $2.42Free cash flow per share $2.91
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
750.0M800.0M850.0M900.0M
2016Diluted shares 881.5M
2017Diluted shares 890.5M
2018Diluted shares 871.0M
2019Diluted shares 875.0M
2020Diluted shares 838.3M
2021Diluted shares 835.3M
2022Diluted shares 805.3M
2023Diluted shares 788.2M
2024Diluted shares 771.9M
2025Diluted shares 764.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Net debt -1.1B
2021Net debt -330.7M
2022Net debt -692.5M
2023Net debt -405.6M
2024Net debt -1.9B
2025Net debt -1.5B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.7×
Interest coverage
104× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.17 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
137 days collects in 91d, stock 110d, pays in 63d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.88grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.56+0.55
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.05 × 3.26-0.16
Operating income ÷ assets 0.20 × 6.72+1.35
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.14 × 1.05+0.14
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.62below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.01+0.93
Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
Soft assets 1.10+0.45
Sales growth 1.14+1.02
Slower depreciation 0.97+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.86-0.15
Profit not in cash -0.07-0.33
Leverage rising 1.03-0.34
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$55.64discounted at 7.5% a year · 68% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
23.0×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
18.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
6.0×
Free cash flow yield
4.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today13.3B
Everything after, today27.7B
The whole business41.0B
Plus net cash1.5B
What belongs to shareholders42.5B
Divided among 764.6M shares: <strong>$55.64</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2016Reported 156.1M
2017Reported 321.9M
2018Reported 423.0M
2019Reported 541.7M
2020Reported 766.1M
2021Reported 995.9M
2022Reported 1.2B
2023Reported 1.5B
2024Reported 1.6B
2025Reported 1.9B
2026Projected 1.1B
2027Projected 1.3B
2028Projected 1.6B
2029Projected 1.8B
2030Projected 2.0B
2031Projected 2.2B
2032Projected 2.4B
2033Projected 2.6B
2034Projected 2.7B
2035Projected 2.8B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
8.3B
9.9B
11.6B
13.3B
15.1B
16.7B
18.2B
19.4B
20.3B
20.8B
Growth
21.5%
19.4%
17.3%
15.2%
13.1%
10.9%
8.8%
6.7%
4.6%
2.5%
Cash margin
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
Free cash flow
1.1B
1.3B
1.6B
1.8B
2.0B
2.2B
2.4B
2.6B
2.7B
2.8B
Worth today
1.0B
1.1B
1.2B
1.3B
1.4B
1.5B
1.5B
1.5B
1.4B
1.4B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.5%
58
63
70
79
91
7.0%
52
57
62
69
77
7.5%
48
51
56
61
68
8.0%
44
47
50
55
60
8.5%
41
43
46
49
54
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
17.5%
19.5%
21.5%
23.5%
25.5%
10.7%
40
43
46
50
54
12.1%
44
47
51
55
59
13.4%
48
52
56
60
65
14.8%
52
56
60
65
70
16.1%
56
60
65
70
76
All the inputs moving at once
4,998 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$40.10
Median$55.60
90th percentile$82.93
$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$46.76</b> and <b>$67.98</b>; one in ten below $40.10, one in ten above $82.93.
Does the long run make sense?
8.4×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.4 times that year's EBITDA.
5%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 46% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 5% on the new capital — it has earned 103% on average over the last five years.
68%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.