DELL · Technology(electronic computers) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-01-30
Dell Technologies Inc. reported revenue of $113.5 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 7.0% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -5.3% in 2017 to 7.2%, and it earned 22.9% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $75.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 54.5% went to acquisitions and 39.1% to buybacks; the share count fell 12.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 0.26 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 2026113.5B+7.0% a year over 9 years
Operating margin7.2%gross margin 20.0%
Return on invested capital22.9%19.6% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay7.8B6.9% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.8×net debt 20.0B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-50.0B050.0B100.0B150.0B
2017Revenue 61.6BOperating income -3.3B
2018Revenue 79.0BOperating income -2.4B
2019Revenue 90.6BOperating income -191.0M
2020Revenue 84.8BOperating income 2.4B
2021Revenue 86.7BOperating income 3.7B
2022Revenue 101.2BOperating income 4.7B
2023Revenue 102.3BOperating income 5.8B
2024Revenue 88.4BOperating income 5.4B
2025Revenue 95.6BOperating income 6.2B
2026Revenue 113.5BOperating income 8.1B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+3.5%
+5.5%
+7.0%
Operating income
+12.2%
+17.2%
—
Net income
+34.5%
+12.8%
—
Earnings per share
+38.8%
+15.4%
—
Free cash flow per share
+155.9%
+0.6%
+22.1%
Dividend per share
+18.6%
—
—
Shares
-3.2%
-2.3%
-1.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 4.2%
-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%
2017Return on invested capital -6.8%
2018Return on invested capital -5.5%
2019Return on invested capital -0.4%
2020Return on invested capital 57.3%
2021Return on invested capital 8.5%
2022Return on invested capital 15.4%
2023Return on invested capital 16.4%
2024Return on invested capital 18.8%
2025Return on invested capital 24.5%
2026Return on invested capital 22.9%
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-10.0B010.0B20.0B30.0B
2017Economic profit -6.9B
2018Economic profit -5.9B
2019Economic profit -2.2B
2020Economic profit 26.8B
2021Economic profit 1.8B
2022Economic profit 2.8B
2023Economic profit 3.2B
2024Economic profit 3.5B
2025Economic profit 4.7B
2026Economic profit 5.4B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
5.9%
Asset turnover
1.12×
Research & development
2.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
10.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-5.0B05.0B10.0B
2017Net income -1.7BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.2B
2018Net income -2.8BFree cash flow 5.6BAfter stock-based pay 4.8B
2019Net income -2.3BFree cash flow 5.5BAfter stock-based pay 4.6B
2020Net income 4.6BFree cash flow 6.7BAfter stock-based pay 5.5B
2021Net income 3.2BFree cash flow 9.3BAfter stock-based pay 7.7B
2022Net income 5.6BFree cash flow 7.5BAfter stock-based pay 5.9B
2023Net income 2.4BFree cash flow 562.0MAfter stock-based pay -369.0M
2024Net income 3.4BFree cash flow 5.9BAfter stock-based pay 5.0B
2025Net income 4.6BFree cash flow 1.9BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2026Net income 5.9BFree cash flow 8.6BAfter stock-based pay 7.8B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
75.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 29%21.9B
Acquisitions 54%40.9B
Dividends 9%6.9B
Share buybacks 39%29.4B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -32%-24.0B
Over the same years it paid 10.0B in stock. The share count fell 12.1%. 19.4B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2017Earnings per share $-2.15Free cash flow per share $2.07
2018Earnings per share $-3.70Free cash flow per share $7.32Dividend per share $0.00
2019Earnings per share $-3.21Free cash flow per share $7.64Dividend per share $2.97
2020Earnings per share $6.15Free cash flow per share $8.94Dividend per share $0.00
2021Earnings per share $4.24Free cash flow per share $12.16Dividend per share $0.00
2022Earnings per share $7.03Free cash flow per share $9.50Dividend per share $0.00
2023Earnings per share $3.24Free cash flow per share $0.75Dividend per share $1.28
2024Earnings per share $4.60Free cash flow per share $8.04Dividend per share $1.46
2025Earnings per share $6.38Free cash flow per share $2.60Dividend per share $1.77
2026Earnings per share $8.68Free cash flow per share $12.50Dividend per share $2.13
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
650.0M700.0M750.0M800.0M
2017Diluted shares 778.0M
2018Diluted shares 769.0M
2019Diluted shares 719.0M
2020Diluted shares 751.0M
2021Diluted shares 767.0M
2022Diluted shares 791.0M
2023Diluted shares 753.0M
2024Diluted shares 736.0M
2025Diluted shares 720.0M
2026Diluted shares 684.0M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
020.0B40.0B60.0B
2017Net debt 39.9B
2018Net debt 37.9B
2019Net debt 43.8B
2020Net debt 42.8B
2021Net debt 29.7B
2022Net debt 17.5B
2023Net debt 21.0B
2024Net debt 18.6B
2025Net debt 20.9B
2026Net debt 20.0B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.8×
Interest coverage
5× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.91 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
-37 days collects in 57d, stock 42d, pays in 135d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
0.26distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.06 × 6.56-0.37
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.03 × 3.26+0.11
Operating income ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.72+0.54
Equity ÷ liabilities -0.02 × 1.05-0.02
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.15below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.44+1.32
Gross margin slipping 1.11+0.59
Soft assets 0.78+0.32
Sales growth 1.19+1.06
Slower depreciation 1.06+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.80-0.14
Profit not in cash -0.05-0.24
Leverage rising 1.04-0.34
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 71% against revenue growing 19%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Inventory is growing 55% against revenue growing 19%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
85% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$731.58discounted at 4.2% a year · 85% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
84.3×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
46.6×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.6×
Free cash flow yield
1.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today77.7B
Everything after, today442.7B
The whole business520.4B
Minus net debt-20.0B
What belongs to shareholders500.4B
Divided among 684.0M shares: <strong>$731.58</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-5.0B05.0B10.0B15.0B
2017Reported 1.2B
2018Reported 4.8B
2019Reported 4.6B
2020Reported 5.5B
2021Reported 7.7B
2022Reported 5.9B
2023Reported -369.0M
2024Reported 5.0B
2025Reported 1.1B
2026Reported 7.8B
2027Projected 8.1B
2028Projected 8.5B
2029Projected 8.9B
2030Projected 9.3B
2031Projected 9.7B
2032Projected 10.1B
2033Projected 10.4B
2034Projected 10.8B
2035Projected 11.1B
2036Projected 11.3B
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
119.8B
126.0B
132.1B
138.0B
143.8B
149.3B
154.5B
159.4B
163.9B
168.0B
Growth
5.5%
5.2%
4.8%
4.5%
4.2%
3.8%
3.5%
3.2%
2.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
Free cash flow
8.1B
8.5B
8.9B
9.3B
9.7B
10.1B
10.4B
10.8B
11.1B
11.3B
Worth today
7.8B
7.8B
7.9B
7.9B
7.9B
7.9B
7.8B
7.7B
7.6B
7.5B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
3.2%
762
1,066
1,784
5,624
—
3.7%
584
748
1,045
1,749
5,515
4.2%
470
571
732
1,022
1,707
4.7%
392
461
561
719
1,005
5.2%
335
385
452
551
705
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
1.5%
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
5.4%
486
536
590
649
712
6.1%
544
600
660
726
797
6.7%
603
665
732
804
883
7.4%
661
729
802
882
968
8.1%
720
794
874
960
1,054
All the inputs moving at once
3,788 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$303.51
Median$595.62
90th percentile$1,129.64
$500.00$1,000.00$1,500.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$420.91</b> and <b>$845.45</b>; one in ten below $303.51, one in ten above $1,129.64.
Does the long run make sense?
40.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 40.5 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
85%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.