COHR · Technology(optical instruments & lenses) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-06-30
Coherent Corp. reported revenue of $7.1 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 24.8% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 11.9% from 2017, and it earned 5.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $3.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 186.0% went to acquisitions and 92.2% back into the business; the share count rose 202.9%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.63 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 4 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20267.1B+24.8% a year over 9 years
Operating margin11.9%gross margin 37.5%
Return on invested capital5.6%2.5% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-1.2B-17.0% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.5×net debt 2.1B
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2017Revenue 972.0MOperating income 115.6M
2018Revenue 1.2BOperating income 136.8M
2019Revenue 1.4BOperating income 148.7M
2020Revenue 2.4BOperating income 39.5M
2021Revenue 3.1BOperating income 402.1M
2022Revenue 3.3BOperating income 414.3M
2023Revenue 5.2BOperating income -37.1M
2024Revenue 4.7BOperating income 96.1M
2025Revenue 5.8BOperating income 94.2M
2026Revenue 7.1BOperating income 847.7M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+11.3%
+18.0%
+24.8%
Operating income
—
+16.1%
+24.8%
Net income
—
+22.0%
+26.8%
Earnings per share
—
+9.8%
+12.1%
Dividend per share
-33.7%
-19.8%
—
Shares
+12.4%
+11.2%
+13.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
7.4%
Return on assets
4.4%
Asset turnover
0.39×
Research & development
10.2% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
14.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B
2017Net income 95.3MFree cash flow -19.9MAfter stock-based pay -31.7M
2018Net income 88.0MFree cash flow 7.6MAfter stock-based pay -7.7M
2019Net income 107.5MFree cash flow 41.4MAfter stock-based pay 19.4M
2020Net income -67.0MFree cash flow 160.4MAfter stock-based pay 91.9M
2021Net income 297.6MFree cash flow 428.0MAfter stock-based pay 357.1M
2022Net income 234.8MFree cash flow 99.0MAfter stock-based pay 25.8M
2023Net income -259.5MFree cash flow 198.0MAfter stock-based pay 49.1M
2024Net income -156.2MFree cash flow 198.9MAfter stock-based pay 72.9M
2025Net income 49.4MFree cash flow 192.8MAfter stock-based pay 32.5M
2026Net income 805.0MFree cash flow -1.0BAfter stock-based pay -1.2B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
3.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 92%3.4B
Acquisitions 186%6.8B
Dividends 3%105.3M
Share buybacks 1%53.1M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -183%-6.6B
Over the same years it paid 883.3M in stock. The share count rose 202.9%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-7.50$-5.00$-2.50$0.00$2.50$5.00
2017Earnings per share $1.48Free cash flow per share $-0.31
2018Earnings per share $1.35Free cash flow per share $0.12
2019Earnings per share $1.63Free cash flow per share $0.63Dividend per share $0.00
2020Earnings per share $-0.79Free cash flow per share $1.89Dividend per share $0.00
2021Earnings per share $2.59Free cash flow per share $3.72Dividend per share $0.18
2022Earnings per share $2.01Free cash flow per share $0.85Dividend per share $0.30
2023Earnings per share $-1.89Free cash flow per share $1.44Dividend per share $0.20
2024Earnings per share $-1.03Free cash flow per share $1.31Dividend per share $0.00
2025Earnings per share $0.32Free cash flow per share $1.25Dividend per share $0.07
2026Earnings per share $4.12Free cash flow per share $-5.24Dividend per share $0.06
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
50.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M
2017Diluted shares 64.5M
2018Diluted shares 65.1M
2019Diluted shares 65.8M
2020Diluted shares 84.8M
2021Diluted shares 115.0M
2022Diluted shares 116.5M
2023Diluted shares 137.6M
2024Diluted shares 151.6M
2025Diluted shares 154.8M
2026Diluted shares 195.4M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-1.0B01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B
2017Net debt 70.1M
2018Net debt 192.0M
2019Net debt 262.1M
2020Net debt 1.8B
2021Net debt -216.8M
2022Net debt -281.9M
2023Net debt 3.5B
2024Net debt 3.2B
2025Net debt 2.8B
2026Net debt 2.1B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.5×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.43 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
124 days collects in 69d, stock 212d, pays in 156d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.63safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.22 × 6.56+1.46
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.07 × 3.26+0.24
Operating income ÷ assets 0.05 × 6.72+0.31
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.54 × 1.05+1.62
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.00below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.14+1.05
Gross margin slipping 0.94+0.50
Soft assets 0.75+0.30
Sales growth 1.23+1.09
Slower depreciation 1.54+0.18
Overheads vs sales 0.92-0.16
Profit not in cash 0.04+0.19
Leverage rising 0.93-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 39% against revenue growing 23%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Inventory is growing 80% against revenue growing 23%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (805M against 80M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
The effective tax rate is 7.2%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
With a free cash flow margin at or below zero in year ten, the business never generates cash for its owners and a DCF says nothing useful. Set a positive margin for year ten to see what it would take.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.