ALNT · Technology(instruments for meas & testing of electricity & elec signals) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Allient Inc reported revenue of $554.5 million in fiscal 2025, after growing 9.5% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 7.9% from 2016, and it earned 7.0% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $291.1 million its operations generated over 10 years, 37.1% went back into the business and 5.6% to acquisitions; the share count rose 83.8%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.86 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2025554.5M+9.5% a year over 9 years
Operating margin7.9%gross margin 32.8%
Return on invested capital7.0%6.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay46.3M8.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.0×net debt 139.7M
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
0200M400M600M
2016Revenue 245.9MOperating income 18.9M
2017Revenue 252.0MOperating income 18.8M
2018Revenue 310.6MOperating income 23.2M
2019Revenue 371.1MOperating income 29.4M
2020Revenue 366.7MOperating income 23.0M
2021Revenue 403.5MOperating income 26.0M
2022Revenue 503.0MOperating income 31.7M
2023Revenue 578.6MOperating income 42.3M
2024Revenue 530.0MOperating income 30.0M
2025Revenue 554.5MOperating income 44.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+3.3%
+8.6%
+9.5%
Operating income
+11.6%
+13.9%
+9.9%
Net income
+8.2%
+10.1%
+10.4%
Earnings per share
+6.5%
+6.7%
+3.1%
Free cash flow per share
—
+22.4%
+12.8%
Dividend per share
+7.5%
+8.1%
+1.6%
Shares
+1.6%
+3.1%
+7.0%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.5%
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%10.0%
2016Return on invested capital 9.3%
2017Return on invested capital 6.7%
2018Return on invested capital 8.0%
2019Return on invested capital 9.2%
2020Return on invested capital 6.3%
2021Return on invested capital 7.2%
2022Return on invested capital 5.2%
2023Return on invested capital 7.3%
2024Return on invested capital 4.8%
2025Return on invested capital 7.0%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-20M-15M-10M-5M05M
2016Economic profit 1.2M
2017Economic profit -2.6M
2018Economic profit -1.2M
2019Economic profit 1.6M
2020Economic profit -5.7M
2021Economic profit -4.6M
2022Economic profit -15.1M
2023Economic profit -5.6M
2024Economic profit -18.1M
2025Economic profit -7.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
7.3%
Return on assets
3.8%
Asset turnover
0.96×
Overheads (SG&A)
10.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-20M020M40M60M
2016Net income 9.1MFree cash flow 9.1M
2017Net income 8.0MFree cash flow 19.2M
2018Net income 15.9MFree cash flow 3.1M
2019Net income 17.0MFree cash flow 19.6MAfter stock-based pay 16.4M
2020Net income 13.6MFree cash flow 15.5MAfter stock-based pay 11.9M
2021Net income 24.1MFree cash flow 11.7MAfter stock-based pay 7.5M
2022Net income 17.4MFree cash flow -10.3MAfter stock-based pay -15.4M
2023Net income 24.1MFree cash flow 33.4MAfter stock-based pay 28.0M
2024Net income 13.2MFree cash flow 32.2MAfter stock-based pay 28.0M
2025Net income 22.0MFree cash flow 49.7MAfter stock-based pay 46.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
291.1M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 37%107.9M
Acquisitions 6%16.2M
Dividends 5%14.0M
Share buybacks 0%0
Kept, or used to pay down debt 53%153.0M
Over the same years it paid 29.0M in stock. The share count rose 83.8%.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$1$0$1$2$3
2016Earnings per share $1.00Free cash flow per share $1.00Dividend per share $0.10
2017Earnings per share $0.87Free cash flow per share $2.07Dividend per share $0.10
2018Earnings per share $1.70Free cash flow per share $0.33Dividend per share $0.12
2019Earnings per share $1.20Free cash flow per share $1.38Dividend per share $0.08
2020Earnings per share $0.95Free cash flow per share $1.08Dividend per share $0.08
2021Earnings per share $1.66Free cash flow per share $0.80Dividend per share $0.09
2022Earnings per share $1.09Free cash flow per share $-0.65Dividend per share $0.10
2023Earnings per share $1.48Free cash flow per share $2.05Dividend per share $0.11
2024Earnings per share $0.79Free cash flow per share $1.94Dividend per share $0.12
2025Earnings per share $1.32Free cash flow per share $2.97Dividend per share $0.12
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
8M10M12M14M16M18M
2016Diluted shares 9.1M
2017Diluted shares 9.3M
2018Diluted shares 9.4M
2019Diluted shares 14.2M
2020Diluted shares 14.3M
2021Diluted shares 14.5M
2022Diluted shares 16.0M
2023Diluted shares 16.3M
2024Diluted shares 16.6M
2025Diluted shares 16.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0100M200M300M
2016Net debt 55.9M
2017Net debt 37.6M
2018Net debt 113.8M
2019Net debt 96.3M
2020Net debt 96.9M
2021Net debt 136.5M
2022Net debt 204.8M
2023Net debt 186.5M
2024Net debt 188.1M
2025Net debt 139.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.0×
Interest coverage
3× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.66 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
138 days collects in 58d, stock 107d, pays in 28d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.86safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.32 × 6.56+2.09
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.34 × 3.26+1.11
Operating income ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.72+0.51
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.09 × 1.05+1.15
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.65below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.08+0.99
Gross margin slipping 0.95+0.50
Soft assets 0.96+0.39
Sales growth 1.05+0.93
Slower depreciation 0.97+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.06-0.28
Leverage rising 0.88-0.29
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (7M) is well below depreciation (25M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$40.11discounted at 8.5% a year · 59% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
30.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
11.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.5×
Free cash flow yield
6.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today334.8M
Everything after, today475.9M
The whole business810.7M
Minus net debt-139.7M
What belongs to shareholders671.1M
Divided among 16.7M shares: <strong>$40.11</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-20M020M40M60M80M
2016
2017
2018
2019Reported 16.4M
2020Reported 11.9M
2021Reported 7.5M
2022Reported -15.4M
2023Reported 28.0M
2024Reported 28.0M
2025Reported 46.3M
2026Projected 40.1M
2027Projected 43.2M
2028Projected 46.3M
2029Projected 49.4M
2030Projected 52.2M
2031Projected 54.9M
2032Projected 57.4M
2033Projected 59.6M
2034Projected 61.5M
2035Projected 63.0M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
601.6M
648.7M
695.2M
740.4M
783.6M
824.1M
861.2M
894.2M
922.5M
945.6M
Growth
8.5%
7.8%
7.2%
6.5%
5.8%
5.2%
4.5%
3.8%
3.2%
2.5%
Cash margin
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
Free cash flow
40.1M
43.2M
46.3M
49.4M
52.2M
54.9M
57.4M
59.6M
61.5M
63.0M
Worth today
37.0M
36.7M
36.3M
35.6M
34.7M
33.7M
32.4M
31.0M
29.5M
27.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.5%
42
46
50
56
63
8.0%
38
41
45
49
55
8.5%
34
37
40
44
48
9.0%
31
34
36
39
43
9.5%
29
31
33
36
39
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
4.5%
6.5%
8.5%
10.5%
12.5%
5.3%
26
29
32
36
39
6.0%
29
33
36
40
44
6.7%
33
36
40
44
49
7.3%
36
40
44
48
53
8.0%
39
43
48
53
58
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$22.77
Median$40.11
90th percentile$65.35
$25.00$50.00$75.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$30.46</b> and <b>$51.91</b>; one in ten below $22.77, one in ten above $65.35.
Does the long run make sense?
9.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 9.1 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
59%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$49,7991 purchase(s) by 1 insider(s)
Sold on the open market$8.0M5 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (instruments for meas & testing of electricity & elec signals) first, then the rest of technology.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.