ADM · Consumer staples(fats & oils) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co reported revenue of $25.0 billion in fiscal 2025, after shrinking 9.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 3.2% in 2017 to 7.5%, and it earned 5.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.2 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 246.8% went back into the business and 185.5% to dividends; the share count fell 15.4%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.31 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202525.0B-9.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin7.5%gross margin -201.5%
Return on invested capital5.3%9.8% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay4.1B16.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.2×net debt 6.6B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B
2017Revenue 60.8BOperating income 1.9B
2018
2018Revenue 64.3BOperating income 2.4B
2019Revenue 64.7BOperating income 2.0B
2020Revenue 64.4BOperating income 2.2B
2021Revenue 85.2BOperating income 3.6B
2022Revenue 27.6BOperating income 5.6B
2023Revenue 25.7BOperating income 4.9B
2024Revenue 24.4BOperating income 3.0B
2025Revenue 25.0BOperating income 1.9B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-3.3%
-17.3%
-9.4%
Operating income
-30.8%
-3.4%
-0.4%
Net income
-37.1%
-9.5%
-4.3%
Earnings per share
-33.9%
-6.6%
-2.5%
Free cash flow per share
+31.3%
—
—
Dividend per share
+8.5%
+7.3%
+5.3%
Shares
-4.9%
-3.0%
-1.8%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 9.4%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%
2017Return on invested capital 7.7%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 7.8%
2019Return on invested capital 6.4%
2020Return on invested capital 7.5%
2021Return on invested capital 9.5%
2022Return on invested capital 14.2%
2023Return on invested capital 12.3%
2024Return on invested capital 7.7%
2025Return on invested capital 5.3%
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B2.0B
2017Economic profit -403.2M
2018
2018Economic profit -414.8M
2019Economic profit -787.7M
2020Economic profit -506.9M
2021Economic profit 46.7M
2022Economic profit 1.6B
2023Economic profit 958.1M
2024Economic profit -509.7M
2025Economic profit -1.2B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
4.7%
Return on assets
2.1%
Asset turnover
0.48×
Research & development
1.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
14.5% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-10.0B-5.0B05.0B10.0B
2017Net income 1.6BFree cash flow -7.0BAfter stock-based pay -7.1B
2018
2018Net income 1.8BFree cash flow -5.6BAfter stock-based pay -5.7B
2019Net income 1.4BFree cash flow -6.3BAfter stock-based pay -6.4B
2020Net income 1.8BFree cash flow -3.2BAfter stock-based pay -3.4B
2021Net income 2.7BFree cash flow 5.4BAfter stock-based pay 5.3B
2022Net income 4.3BFree cash flow 2.2BAfter stock-based pay 2.0B
2023Net income 3.5BFree cash flow 3.0BAfter stock-based pay 2.9B
2024Net income 1.8BFree cash flow 1.2BAfter stock-based pay 1.2B
2025Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 4.2BAfter stock-based pay 4.1B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
4.2B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 247%10.3B
Acquisitions 126%5.3B
Dividends 186%7.8B
Share buybacks 181%7.6B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -638%-26.7B
Over the same years it paid 992.0M in stock. The share count fell 15.4%. 6.6B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-20.00$-10.00$0.00$10.00
2017Earnings per share $2.79Free cash flow per share $-12.26Dividend per share $1.28
2018
2018Earnings per share $3.19Free cash flow per share $-9.92Dividend per share $1.34
2019Earnings per share $2.44Free cash flow per share $-11.12Dividend per share $1.40
2020Earnings per share $3.14Free cash flow per share $-5.68Dividend per share $1.43
2021Earnings per share $4.79Free cash flow per share $9.59Dividend per share $1.47
2022Earnings per share $7.71Free cash flow per share $3.83Dividend per share $1.60
2023Earnings per share $6.43Free cash flow per share $5.47Dividend per share $1.80
2024Earnings per share $3.65Free cash flow per share $2.49Dividend per share $2.00
2025Earnings per share $2.23Free cash flow per share $8.69Dividend per share $2.04
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
475.0M500.0M525.0M550.0M575.0M
2017Diluted shares 572.0M
2018
2018Diluted shares 567.0M
2019Diluted shares 565.0M
2020Diluted shares 565.0M
2021Diluted shares 566.0M
2022Diluted shares 563.0M
2023Diluted shares 542.0M
2024Diluted shares 493.0M
2025Diluted shares 484.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2017Net debt 5.8B
2018
2018Net debt 6.3B
2019Net debt 6.8B
2020Net debt 7.2B
2021Net debt 7.6B
2022Net debt 7.6B
2023Net debt 6.9B
2024Net debt 7.6B
2025Net debt 6.6B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.2×
Interest coverage
3× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.37 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
69 days collects in 44d, stock 50d, pays in 25d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.31safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.14 × 6.56+0.89
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.42 × 3.26+1.37
Operating income ÷ assets 0.04 × 6.72+0.24
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.77 × 1.05+0.81
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.95below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.80+0.73
Gross margin slipping 1.13+0.60
Soft assets 1.01+0.41
Sales growth 1.02+0.91
Slower depreciation 1.00+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.95-0.16
Profit not in cash -0.08-0.39
Leverage rising 0.97-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$64.60discounted at 9.4% a year · 49% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
29.0×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.5×
Free cash flow yield
13.2%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today19.2B
Everything after, today18.7B
The whole business37.9B
Minus net debt-6.6B
What belongs to shareholders31.3B
Divided among 484.0M shares: <strong>$64.60</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-10.0B-5.0B05.0B10.0B
2017Reported -7.1B
2018
2018Reported -5.7B
2019Reported -6.4B
2020Reported -3.4B
2021Reported 5.3B
2022Reported 2.0B
2023Reported 2.9B
2024Reported 1.2B
2025Reported 4.1B
2026Projected 3.3B
2027Projected 3.2B
2028Projected 3.1B
2029Projected 3.0B
2030Projected 2.9B
2031Projected 2.9B
2032Projected 2.9B
2033Projected 2.9B
2034Projected 3.0B
2035Projected 3.0B
2017201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
23.7B
22.7B
22.0B
21.4B
21.1B
20.9B
20.9B
21.1B
21.4B
21.9B
Growth
-5.0%
-4.2%
-3.3%
-2.5%
-1.7%
-0.8%
0.0%
0.8%
1.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
Free cash flow
3.3B
3.2B
3.1B
3.0B
2.9B
2.9B
2.9B
2.9B
3.0B
3.0B
Worth today
3.0B
2.6B
2.3B
2.1B
1.9B
1.7B
1.6B
1.4B
1.3B
1.2B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
8.3%
67
72
77
84
92
8.8%
62
66
70
76
82
9.4%
57
61
65
69
75
9.8%
53
56
60
63
68
10.3%
50
52
55
58
62
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-9.0%
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
11.1%
43
48
53
59
65
12.5%
48
53
59
65
72
13.9%
52
58
65
72
79
15.3%
57
63
70
78
86
16.7%
62
69
76
84
93
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.1%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$46.14
Median$64.77
90th percentile$92.91
$50.00$75.00$100.00$125.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$54.02</b> and <b>$77.58</b>; one in ten below $46.14, one in ten above $92.91.
Does the long run make sense?
17.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 17.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
49%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.