IDXX · Health care(in vitro & in vivo diagnostic substances) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Idexx Laboratories Inc reported revenue of $4.3 billion in fiscal 2025. Of the $5.8 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 78.1% went to buybacks and 17.6% back into the business. On the accounting screens, it passes 8 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 10.43 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20254.3B
Operating margin31.6%gross margin 61.8%
Return on invested capital52.9%47.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay997.1M23.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.2×net debt 269.8M
Piotroski F-score8/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2018
2018Revenue 2.2BOperating income 491.3M
2019
2019Revenue 2.4BOperating income 552.8M
2020Revenue 2.7BOperating income 694.5M
2021Revenue 3.2BOperating income 932.0M
2022Revenue 3.4BOperating income 898.8M
2023Revenue 3.7BOperating income 1.1B
2024Revenue 3.9BOperating income 1.1B
2025Revenue 4.3BOperating income 1.4B
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+8.5%
+9.7%
—
Operating income
+14.8%
+14.4%
—
Net income
+16.0%
+12.7%
—
Earnings per share
+17.7%
+14.3%
—
Free cash flow per share
+41.0%
+15.9%
—
Shares
-1.4%
-1.3%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 9.5%
0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 68.3%
2019
2019Return on invested capital 51.7%
2020Return on invested capital 39.6%
2021Return on invested capital 49.9%
2022Return on invested capital 51.5%
2023Return on invested capital 40.0%
2024Return on invested capital 40.8%
2025Return on invested capital 52.9%
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2018
2018Economic profit 348.7M
2019
2019Economic profit 369.9M
2020Economic profit 464.9M
2021Economic profit 623.3M
2022Economic profit 579.3M
2023Economic profit 667.1M
2024Economic profit 693.2M
2025Economic profit 893.6M
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
66.0%
Return on assets
31.6%
Asset turnover
1.28×
Research & development
5.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
9.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2018
2018Net income 377.0MFree cash flow 284.3MAfter stock-based pay 259.2M
2019
2019Net income 427.7MFree cash flow 304.2MAfter stock-based pay 264.9M
2020Net income 581.8MFree cash flow 541.1MAfter stock-based pay 510.2M
2021Net income 744.8MFree cash flow 636.0MAfter stock-based pay 598.2M
2022Net income 679.1MFree cash flow 394.1MAfter stock-based pay 344.4M
2023Net income 845.0MFree cash flow 772.9MAfter stock-based pay 713.1M
2024Net income 887.9MFree cash flow 808.1MAfter stock-based pay 747.8M
2025Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 997.1M
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2025
5.8B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 18%1.0B
Acquisitions 6%335.9M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 78%4.5B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -1%-84.3M
Over the same years it paid 363.0M in stock. 4.2B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2018
2018Earnings per share $4.26Free cash flow per share $3.21
2019
2019Earnings per share $4.89Free cash flow per share $3.47
2020Earnings per share $6.71Free cash flow per share $6.24
2021Earnings per share $8.60Free cash flow per share $7.35
2022Earnings per share $8.03Free cash flow per share $4.66
2023Earnings per share $10.06Free cash flow per share $9.20
2024Earnings per share $10.67Free cash flow per share $9.71
2025Earnings per share $13.08Free cash flow per share $13.05
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
80.0M82.0M84.0M86.0M88.0M90.0M
2018
2018Diluted shares 88.5M
2019
2019Diluted shares 87.5M
2020Diluted shares 86.7M
2021Diluted shares 86.6M
2022Diluted shares 84.6M
2023Diluted shares 84.0M
2024Diluted shares 83.2M
2025Diluted shares 81.0M
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2018
2018Net debt 478.0M
2019
2019Net debt 608.6M
2020Net debt 524.6M
2021Net debt 705.7M
2022Net debt 656.8M
2023Net debt 243.9M
2024Net debt 329.3M
2025Net debt 269.8M
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.2×
Interest coverage
35× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.23 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
106 days collects in 47d, stock 84d, pays in 25d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
8of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
10.43safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.56+0.52
Retained earnings ÷ assets 1.91 × 3.26+6.22
Operating income ÷ assets 0.41 × 6.72+2.73
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.92 × 1.05+0.97
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.49below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.06+0.97
Gross margin slipping 0.99+0.52
Soft assets 0.99+0.40
Sales growth 1.10+0.98
Slower depreciation 0.95+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.83-0.14
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 0.99-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$218.89discounted at 9.5% a year · 54% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
16.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.0×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.2×
Free cash flow yield
5.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today8.2B
Everything after, today9.8B
The whole business18.0B
Minus net debt-269.8M
What belongs to shareholders17.7B
Divided among 81.0M shares: <strong>$218.89</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2018
2018Reported 259.2M
2019
2019Reported 264.9M
2020Reported 510.2M
2021Reported 598.2M
2022Reported 344.4M
2023Reported 713.1M
2024Reported 747.8M
2025Reported 997.1M
2026Projected 1.0B
2027Projected 1.1B
2028Projected 1.2B
2029Projected 1.3B
2030Projected 1.3B
2031Projected 1.4B
2032Projected 1.5B
2033Projected 1.6B
2034Projected 1.6B
2035Projected 1.6B
2018201920202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
4.7B
5.1B
5.5B
5.9B
6.3B
6.7B
7.0B
7.3B
7.5B
7.7B
Growth
9.5%
8.7%
7.9%
7.2%
6.4%
5.6%
4.8%
4.1%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
21.4%
Free cash flow
1.0B
1.1B
1.2B
1.3B
1.3B
1.4B
1.5B
1.6B
1.6B
1.6B
Worth today
919.6M
913.3M
900.6M
881.7M
857.0M
826.8M
791.8M
752.7M
710.2M
665.0M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
8.5%
227
241
258
278
302
9.0%
210
223
237
254
273
9.5%
196
207
219
233
249
10.0%
184
193
204
215
229
10.5%
173
181
190
200
212
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
13.5%
17.1%
157
170
184
200
216
19.2%
171
186
201
218
237
21.4%
186
202
219
237
257
23.5%
200
218
236
256
278
25.6%
215
233
254
275
299
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 3.2%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$164.63
Median$219.15
90th percentile$300.77
$200.00$300.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$187.57</b> and <b>$257.10</b>; one in ten below $164.63, one in ten above $300.77.
Does the long run make sense?
9.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 9.0 times that year's EBITDA.
16%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 16% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 16% on the new capital — it has earned 47% on average over the last five years.
54%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.