Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

EPD · Energy (natural gas transmission) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported revenue of $52.6 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 9.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 15.6% in 2016 to 13.8%. Of the $68.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 52.5% went back into the business and 8.1% to acquisitions; the share count rose 4.7%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.

Revenue, fiscal 2025 52.6B +9.6% a year over 9 years

Operating margin 13.8% gross margin 26.7%

Return on invested capital —

Free cash flow after stock pay 2.8B 5.3% of revenue

Net debt ÷ EBITDA 3.6× net debt 33.4B

Piotroski F-score 6/9 tests of improvement passed

Is it growing?

Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.

RevenueOperating income

Compound growth a year
	3 yrs	5 yrs	9 yrs
Revenue	-3.3%	+14.1%	+9.6%
Operating income	+1.7%	+7.6%	+8.2%
Net income	+1.9%	+9.0%	+9.8%
Earnings per share	+2.1%	+9.1%	+9.2%
Free cash flow per share	-21.1%	+2.8%	+11.3%
Shares	-0.2%	-0.1%	+0.5%

Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.

Does it earn more than its capital costs?

Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.

    GrossOperatingNetFree cash flow
    
  

Return on invested capital

Return on invested capital Cost of capital today · 5.2%

Economic profit

Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.

Return on equity: —
Return on assets: 7.5%
Asset turnover: 0.68×
Overheads (SG&A): 0.5% of revenue

Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?

Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.

Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay

Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025

68.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.

Reinvested in the business 52% 35.7B
Acquisitions 8% 5.5B
Dividends 0% 0
Share buybacks 2% 1.5B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 37% 25.4B

Over the same years it paid 1.5B in stock. The share count rose 4.7%. 5.0M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.

Per share

    Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
    
  

Shares outstanding

Diluted shares

How strong is the balance sheet?

Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.

Net debt

Net debt ÷ EBITDA: 3.6×
Interest coverage: 5× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio: 1.04 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle: —

Three classic screens of the accounts

Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.

Piotroski F-score

Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.

6of 9 tests passed

ProfitableReturn on assets above zero passed
Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zero passed
Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year before failed
Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals) passed
Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell failed
More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year before passed
No new sharesShare count did not grow passed
Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before passed
Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year before failed

Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.

Altman Z''-score

Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?

The accounts lack a line it needs (retained earnings, current assets or liabilities).

Beneish M-score

Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?

-2.76below the -1.78 line

Receivables vs sales 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.92
Gross margin slipping 0.91+0.48
Soft assets 1.01+0.41
Sales growth 0.94+0.83
Slower depreciation 0.99+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.10-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 0.98-0.32

Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.

Where the statements disagree

Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.

The effective tax rate is 0.4%.

Benign

A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.

Worrying

Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.

Net debt is 3.6 times EBITDA.

Benign

A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.

Worrying

Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.

What is it worth, under which assumptions?

A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.

Revenue

Starting revenue

M $

revenue of fiscal 2025

Growth in year one

revenue grew +14.1% a year over the last 5 years; it fades to the terminal rate by the last year

Years until it settles

yrs

ten years for growth to fade to the terminal rate

Cash from each sale

Free cash flow margin today

free cash flow to the firm after stock-based pay ÷ revenue, last 3 fiscal years together

Margin in the last year

the margin in year ten; by default the business keeps today's

Count stock-based pay as a costIt is paid in shares instead of cash, and shareholders bear it through dilution. Most free cash flow figures leave it out.

The long run

Growth after that, forever

growth forever after year ten, below the risk-free rate: no company outgrows the economy forever

The discount rate

Risk-free rate

10-year US Treasury yield (FRED, DGS10), 2026-09-24

Beta

not measured on this public page, which uses only public filings: 1.0 assumes it moves like the market. Sign in to measure it from prices

Equity risk premium

the extra return demanded for holding shares; it cannot be measured, and 4–6% is the common range

Cost of debt, before tax

interest expense ÷ debt = 4.1%, kept between the risk-free rate and +8 points

Tax rate

effective rate in the last fiscal year, 0.4%, kept within 0–35%

The price

Share price

Type the price you see at your broker. It is used only for the reverse questions: what that price implies.

Back to the defaults

SEC from the filings Treasury the 10-year yield measured from prices assumption cannot be measured yours you changed it

80% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.

Value per share, with these assumptions $161.62 discounted at 5.2% a year · 80% of it from after year 10

$90.1280% of 4,661 simulations$301.07

Cautious $68.11 10.0% growth · 9.8% margin · 6.2% discount · 2.0% forever

Your assumptions $161.62 14.0% growth · 11.5% margin · 5.2% discount · 2.5% forever

Generous $536.18 18.0% growth · 13.2% margin · 4.2% discount · 3.0% forever

Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.

What the value implies, in the usual multiples

	At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings	60.9×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA	41.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue	7.4×
Free cash flow yield	0.8%

From cash flows to a value per share

10 years of cash flow, today78.0B

Everything after, today309.0B

The whole business387.1B

Minus net debt-33.4B

What belongs to shareholders353.6B

Divided among 2.2B shares: $161.62 each.

The projection next to its history

Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.

ReportedProjected

Year by year

	2026	2027	2028	2029	2030	2031	2032	2033	2034	2035
Revenue	60.0B	67.6B	75.3B	83.0B	90.4B	97.2B	103.4B	108.6B	112.7B	115.5B
Growth	14.0%	12.7%	11.4%	10.2%	8.9%	7.6%	6.3%	5.1%	3.8%	2.5%
Cash margin	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%	11.5%
Free cash flow	6.9B	7.8B	8.6B	9.5B	10.4B	11.2B	11.9B	12.5B	12.9B	13.3B
Worth today	6.5B	7.0B	7.4B	7.8B	8.1B	8.3B	8.3B	8.3B	8.2B	8.0B

If the least-known inputs move

Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.

The discount rate and growth forever

discount ↓ · forever →	1.5%	2.0%	2.5%	3.0%	3.5%
4.2%	168	208	271	389	686
4.7%	138	165	204	266	382
5.2%	117	136	162	200	261
5.7%	100	114	133	158	196
6.2%	87	98	112	130	155

Year-one growth and the final margin

margin ↓ · growth →	10.0%	12.0%	14.0%	16.0%	18.0%
9.2%	106	117	129	142	156
10.3%	120	132	145	160	175
11.5%	133	147	162	177	194
12.6%	147	162	178	195	214
13.8%	160	176	194	213	233

All the inputs moving at once

4,661 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.

10th percentile$90.12

Median$155.59

90th percentile$301.07

Half of the simulations land between $116.06 and $215.75; one in ten below $90.12, one in ten above $301.07.

Does the long run make sense?

24.9×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 24.9 times that year's EBITDA.
15%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 17% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 15% on the new capital.
80%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.

The discount rate, taken apart

What shareholders demand (CAPM): 5.18% risk-free + 1.00 beta × 5.0% premium = 10.18%.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 5.18% × (1 − 0.4%) = 5.16%.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): 5.16%, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.

What it has filed lately

The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.

Shares 2026-08-21

Registering new shares

Quarterly 2026-08-07

Quarterly report

Event 2026-07-30

Signed a material agreement; reported results; took on a financial obligation

Event 2026-07-01

Changed a director or officer

Signed a material agreement; took on a financial obligation

Annual 2026-02-27

Annual report

Estimatein 40d

Results for the period ending 2026-09-29

Companies like this one

Same SEC industry (natural gas transmission) first, then the rest of energy.

WMB Williams Companies, Inc.ET Energy Transfer LP KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc.TRGP Targa Resources Corp.CVX Chevron Corp COP Conocophillips MPC Marathon Petroleum Corp VLO Valero Energy Corp

Every figure, year by year

10 fiscal years · 30 measures

	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025
Size
Revenue	23.0B	29.2B	36.5B	32.8B	27.2B	40.8B	58.2B	49.7B	56.2B	52.6B
Revenue growth	—	+27.0%	+24.9%	-10.3%	-17.0%	+50.0%	+42.6%	-14.6%	+13.1%	-6.4%
Operating income	3.6B	3.9B	5.4B	6.1B	5.0B	6.1B	6.9B	6.9B	7.3B	7.3B
Net income	2.5B	2.8B	4.2B	4.6B	3.8B	4.6B	5.5B	5.5B	5.9B	5.8B
Margins
Gross margin	31.8%	26.5%	26.7%	32.7%	38.5%	26.8%	21.2%	25.5%	24.3%	26.7%
Operating margin	15.6%	13.4%	14.8%	18.5%	18.5%	15.0%	11.9%	13.9%	13.1%	13.8%
Net margin	10.9%	9.6%	11.4%	14.0%	13.9%	11.4%	9.4%	11.1%	10.5%	11.0%
Free cash flow margin	4.7%	5.4%	5.2%	6.1%	9.6%	15.4%	10.4%	8.7%	6.4%	5.6%
R&D ÷ revenue	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
SG&A ÷ revenue	0.7%	0.6%	0.6%	0.6%	0.8%	0.5%	0.4%	0.5%	0.4%	0.5%
Cash
Free cash flow	1.1B	1.6B	1.9B	2.0B	2.6B	6.3B	6.1B	4.3B	3.6B	3.0B
Stock-based pay	89.2M	99.7M	106.1M	143.9M	159.0M	152.0M	157.0M	172.0M	188.0M	197.0M
Free cash flow after stock pay	993.5M	1.5B	1.8B	1.8B	2.4B	6.1B	5.9B	4.1B	3.4B	2.8B
Free cash flow to the firm	2.1B	2.0B	4.0B	1.6B	2.2B	3.9B	6.9B	10.9B	4.1B	3.8B
Free cash flow ÷ net income	0.4×	0.6×	0.5×	0.4×	0.7×	1.4×	1.1×	0.8×	0.6×	0.5×
Capex ÷ revenue	13.0%	10.6%	11.6%	13.8%	12.1%	5.4%	3.4%	6.6%	8.1%	10.7%
Returns
Return on invested capital	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Return on equity	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Return on assets	4.8%	5.1%	7.3%	7.4%	5.9%	6.9%	8.1%	7.8%	7.6%	7.5%
Asset turnover	0.4×	0.5×	0.6×	0.5×	0.4×	0.6×	0.9×	0.7×	0.7×	0.7×
Economic profit	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Per share
Earnings per share	$1.20	$1.30	$1.91	$2.09	$1.71	$2.10	$2.50	$2.52	$2.69	$2.66
Free cash flow per share	$0.52	$0.73	$0.87	$0.90	$1.18	$2.86	$2.76	$1.96	$1.63	$1.36
Dividend per share	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Payout ratio	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Book value per share	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Diluted shares	2.1B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B	2.2B
Balance sheet
Net debt	23.6B	24.6B	25.8B	27.3B	28.8B	26.7B	28.2B	28.6B	31.3B	33.4B
Net debt ÷ EBITDA	4.6×	4.4×	3.6×	3.4×	4.1×	3.4×	3.2×	3.3×	3.4×	3.6×
Interest coverage	3.6×	4.0×	4.9×	4.9×	3.9×	4.8×	5.6×	5.5×	5.4×	5.2×
Current ratio	0.8×	0.7×	0.8×	0.9×	1.1×	1.1×	0.9×	0.9×	1.0×	1.0×
Cash conversion cycle (days)	85	68	42	72	121	87	58	—	—	—
Scores
Piotroski F-score	—	6	7	7	5	7	7	7	6	6
Altman Z''	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Beneish M	—	-2.27	-2.73	-2.42	-2.77	-2.04	-2.34	-2.88	-2.50	-2.76

Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.